| February 2000
Phrasing
I would like to share with you a phrasing concept I am sure has been done before
but I did however think of it on my own. You may have even discovered this already but in
case you havent, Im going to lay it on you. The best place to start is to probably tell you where the inspiration for this concept came from. I was listening to some stuff that Vinnie Colaiuta did with Frank Zappa and there I was again shaking my head and rolling my eyes. You know, listening to the typical out Vinnie licks and just saying, Man . the guy is just incredible with how he phrases. You never hear another drummer play the same kind of phrases that Vinnie plays. The ones that take you so far away from the quarter note but yet always bring you back perfectly to one. I always used to just write them off as Vinnie licks. The ones that you dont even bother to try to figure out because its a Vinnie thing Well one day I became courageous and asked myself how he does it. I just tried to make sense out of it. About the same time I began my adventure, I read an article where Neil Peart made this remark about Buddy Richs playing. Its not so much trying to figure out what Buddy played but its trying to figure out how he thinks. This is where the little light went on for me. I started thinking to myself that Vinnie along with Weckl and all the other greats probably dont use the same approach or method every time they play a tune. In other words, when I am following one of their tunes and counting in MY usual fashion, 1 .2 3 ..4 It is possible that they are not thinking the same thing and that is why the licks sound so out to me.
So now I
will explain the concept that the above provoked. Just be aware that I am not saying that
this is what they do or how they think. It is an educated guess as the result of my asking
why. When I use it however, it sounds pretty close to the Vinnie
thing.
In 4/4
time we are all taught
1..2..3..4
.or 1 e an du
2 e an
du
.etc
or whatever subdivision you like. In this method, we phrase over 4
beats. We have all counted this way since we
made the choice to become drummers. It is the very backbone of how we phrase. In essence,
counting determines how we will phrase. So, if we change the counting, the phrasing should
change too!!! For example, if we are going to play a two measure fill in 4/4 time we
normally would count 4 quarters in each measure for a total of eight quarters. 1..2..3..4
2..2..3..4 is a popular method. What we are doing is dividing the two measures up
by cutting them right down the middle. 4 quarters in each measure. This is dictating a
particular way to phrase the fill. So lets change it. We have a total of 8 quarters.
Instead of starting our counting over after beat 4 of each measure, we can use any
combination of numbers for counting the fill as long as it equals eight. For ex.
1..2..3
- 1..2..3..4..5. or 1..2.. 1..2..3..4..5..6.. We always here where we
say one as the perfect place to start our phrase. So if we change where one is
said then the way we phrase will be changed. It just makes sense. So your probably saying,
all you are saying is to throw in some odd time measures. Well, yes. That IS what I am saying. But because
we are so used to approaching things the same old way all the time, the only time we use
are odd time skills is when the time signature tells us to. We never really utilize them
or THINK of utilizing them when the time signature is 4/4.
Ok, so
what happens when we are in 4/4 and we need to fill over ONE measure. There are only 4
quarters so there isnt much we can do as far as coming up with different
combinations of counting to equal 4. Right?? WRONG!! There ARE only 4 quarters to a
measure of 4/4 but there are also 8 eighth notes. Count the eighth note instead. Remember,
do not count the eighth notes 1..+..2..+..3..+..4..+
Turn the +s into
numbers
.1..2..3..4..5..6..7..8. Use any combination you want as long as it equals
eight eighths. How about filling over TWO
measures counting the eighth note. Now you have 16 notes to work with. Now you have even
more possibilities. You can count for ex. 3beats , 3 beats, 3 beats and 7 beats. Or 10
beats and 3 beats and 3 beats. Im sure you get the point by now. You cant get
the full effect of this until you try it. You will not believe what this does to your
phrasing. If you record yourself doing this, count the normal way on the
playback and you will find the Vinnie thing is starting to happen. The phrases will not
fit the conventional way of counting.
Is this
what he does??? I have no Idea. But I guarantee this will totally change your phrasing.
Have fun with this and take it to all degrees to come up with some very refreshing
phrases.
In
closing, I would like to say to constantly challenge yourself by coming up with alternate
methods of how you approach things when you play. It is a big step in developing
originality in your playing and will really blow the roof off of your abilities.
Have
fun!! Fran Merante
|